Bode is faced with a decision on whether
to buy a car or simply get an accommodation. He has been living with
his parents for some time and thinks now is the best time for him to
move. He also needs a car as commuting to work every day for him has
been very stressful. He doesn’t know how long he can keep jumping buses
and hitching rides. His dilemma is compounded by the fact that his two
most immediate needs are mutually exclusive. He only has enough money to
fund either and not both, or so he thought.
How often do we find ourselves in this
situation; and rather than apply common sense, we let our emotions and
subsequently indecision influence us to make wrong decisions. I believe
there is a better way to handle this dilemma. Let’s explore some of
them.
Which is absolutely more critical?
One of the most important things you
must do is determine which one is absolutely more critical. If for
example, you are squatting with friends or a relative and have been
given a deadline to move out, then getting an accommodation is
absolutely more crucial, especially if you do not have an alternative.
You certainly can’t live in a car for too long. Looking at things this
way helps you rank needs in order of priority. It also requires that you
think less of your emotional attachment to either a car or an
accommodation.
Opportunity cost
Understanding which of the two costs
more if left undone is also a very good metric for easier decision
making. For example, if you decide to pay for an accommodation, will it
mean spending more on transportation and suffering a lot more in terms
of inconvenience? Using Bode’s example above, he still stays with his
parents and his reason for wanting to leave is probably because he needs
his space and independence. Therefore, if it is more inconvenient for
him to jump buses than for him to live with his parents; then, I’d
rather he bought a car.
Which will be more difficult to get if you miss the opportunity?
There are some opportunities that are
presented to us that when lost are hard to come by again. When faced
with the dilemma of whether to get a house or a car, I suggest you also
ask yourself, which will be easier to defer and you will still have the
opportunity to buy or pay for. For example, you may get a house in a
choice neighbourhood at a fairly good rent. It may even be that you just
love the house. Not taking it now may mean not getting that opportunity
again. It can also be that the car itself is coming at a very good
price considering its market value, and not buying it now may mean the
opportunity is lost forever. Understanding wants and scarcity this way
helps you also make the right judgment call.
Which cost less?
You can’t be considering this decision
without finding out the cost of taking either decision. The absolute
cost and carrying cost of the two options are also very important to
consider before taking that decision. If you buy a car as against
renting a house, will you have the money to maintain it? If it is a
house, are you now able to pay your light bills, water bills, maintain
the house, furnish it and even afford the next due rent? This may all
look very unnecessary considering the urge to just take a decision, but
it is important to assess the cost implication of either options.
What are the substitutes?
Most things in life have natural
substitutes. An alternative to buying a car, for example, may be to get a
cheaper one, a lower model car or even a fairly used car. If avoiding
public transportation is your ultimate goal; then, it hardly matters
what sort of car you buy. Thinking this way broadens your mind and gives
you a wide range of options to choose from. Same goes for a house too.
You can decide to rent a two-bedroom or three-bedroom apartment. Or you
can choose to live in a relatively cheaper neighbourhood. This all
depends on the compelling reason for looking for an accommodation. I
know some people who would rather live in a one-bedroom apartment just
because they love the neighbourhood and rather than to move to a cheaper
area even if it is a bigger apartment. Your principle will guide what
is the right substitute.
Which one gives you peace of mind?
In making a decision, you also do not
want to forgo buying a car, or renting a house; not buying it will
constantly make you unhappy. That alone is a punishment, which you can
end up suffering till you get what you want. Imagine not buying a car
and every day you come back home late, tired, smelly and frowning. There
is the likelihood that you will soon start to hate the house. Same for
if you buy a car when what your heart really wants is an accommodation.
This is also an important metric to consider even if it isn’t as crucial
as the rest.
How have you performed when faced with two mutually exclusive decisions?
No comments:
Post a Comment